Legal Opinion

State v. Garcia

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 7, 1986No. 1 CA-CR 9785-PRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL G. ULRICH, Judge Pro Tem.

The central question presented for our determination is whether our supreme court’s decision in State v. Hunter, 142 Ariz. 88, 688 P.2d 980 (1984), holding instruction of a jury pursuant to Recommended Arizona Jury Instruction 4.01 is fundamental error, is to be given fully retroactive effect. We hold that full retroactivity is required, and accordingly reverse the trial court’s dismissal of the petition for post-conviction relief here involved and remand for a new trial.

FACTS

Petitioner was charged by information filed August 31, 1981 with two counts of…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. LoganArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. SlemmerArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. DiazArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Denise H. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  5. Taylor v. SherrillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API