Legal Opinion

State v. Diaz

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1991No. CR-90-0212-PRPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

MOELLER, Justice.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Mario Palma Diaz (defendant) was convicted of transportation for sale of a narcotic drug and of wilfully fleeing from a pursuing law enforcement vehicle. He contended that he committed the acts under duress and the trial court, at defendant’s request, instructed the jury on the elements of duress. Defense counsel also requested, and the court gave, Recommended Arizona Jury Instruction (RAJI) 4.01, which read:

If you decide that the defendant's conduct was justified, you must find the defendant not guilty. 1

Defense counsel based part…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. GendronArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. HunterArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. CarverArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. EvansArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Shoong v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. WestArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. DickensArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. LoganArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. SlemmerArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. MannArizona Supreme Court · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API