Legal Opinion

Luhnow v. Horn

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 2001No. 25A05-0106-CV-241PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHARPNACK, Chief Judge.

Douglas and Beth Luhnow (collectively, the "Lubnows") 1 appeal the trial court's grant of Eugene Horn's motion for summary judgment. The Luhnows raise two issues, which we expand and restate as:

1. Whether the law-of-the-case doctrine precluded the trial court from granting Horn's motion for summary judgment;

2. Whether the trial court erred by granting Horn's motion for summary judgment because the Luh-nows are entitled as third-party beneficiaries to enforce the contract between the Fulton County Drainage Board ("Drainage Board") and Horn; and

3. Whether the trial…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Rosi v. Business Furniture Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Stephenson v. LedbetterIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Ayres v. Indian Heights Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Colonial Penn Insurance v. GuzorekIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Cowe Ex Rel. Cowe v. Forum Group, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Romine v. GagleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Celadon Trucking Services, Inc. v. Charles Wilmoth and Kent Vassey, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situatedIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Harlan Bakeries, Inc. v. MuncyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Dennis Samples v. Steve Wilson and Donald & Ingrid Bannon, husband and wife, and Ronald & Edna Bannon, husband and wifeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc. v. ReynoldsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API