Mitchell v. Mitchell
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s granting of the defendant’s motion for modification of a postmajority support order and the allowance of counsel fees to defend the appeal. The following facts are necessary for the consideration of this claim.
*344On May 27,1986, a judgment of dissolution was rendered incorporating the parties’ executed settlement agreement. Among the provisions of the agreement were the following: The plaintiff was to contribute two thirds and the defendant one third of the actual costs for the college education of each child, not to exceed the amount then charged by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Friedlander v. FriedlanderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Albrecht v. AlbrechtConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Hirtle v. HirtleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Cattaneo v. CattaneoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Bucy v. BucyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Clement v. ClementConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Puris v. PurisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Passamano v. PassamanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992