Legal Opinion
Maureen Little v. Windermere Relocation, Inc., a Washington Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 23, 2002No. 99-35668PublishedCited by 151 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on September 12, 2001, is hereby amended. With the amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Fed. RApp. P. 35(b).
The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.
OPINION
THOMAS, Circuit Judge.
Maureen Little (“Little”) appeals from an order granting summary judgment on her claims of hostile work…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Carole Tomka v. The Seiler Corporation, Daniel Lucey, David Polonsky and Timothy ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by151 opinions
- Reloynne K. Villiarimo Joseph Harvest v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., Dba Island Air Rosie Nenezich Richard HeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Sergio E. Fonseca v. Sysco Food Services of Arizona, Inc., a Delaware For-Profit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Morris v. City of Colorado SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Lynda Stegall v. Citadel Broadcasting Company Citadel Communications Corporation Marathon Media LpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Freitag v. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.