Legal Opinion
Freitag v. Ayers
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 13, 2006No. Nos. 03-16702, 03-17184, 03-17398PublishedCited by 228 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND AMENDED OPINION
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
The opinion filed September 13, 2006, slip op. 11183, and appearing at 463 F.3d 838 (9th Cir.2006), is hereby amended as follows:
1. At slip op. at 11205, line 4: insert “sufficiently” after “failed to invoke”.
2. At slip op. at 11205, line 4: after the sentence ending with “in this case.” in*532sert the following footnote: The jury-had before it evidence offered by the defendants regarding disciplinary measures taken, including a belated referral for criminal prosecution of a principal offender after Freitag had filed her…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by228 opinions
- Robert Reese, Jr. v. County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Eng v. CooleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Jackler v. ByrneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Nancy Walsh v. Nevada Department of Human Resources, Division of Healthcare, Finance and Policy State of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Weintraub v. Board of Educ. of City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
223 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.