Legal Opinion

Glodek v. Rowinski

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 22, 1986No. C5-85-2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Joseph Kapala, deceased, and Thomas Glodek, appellant, owned stock in a funeral service corporation and owned real estate as partners. The two had signed agreements permitting the survivor the right to purchase the other party’s stock and his partnership interest. When Kapala died, Glodek attempted to exercise his purchase rights. The estate refused to sell, claiming that Glodek’s offer was too low and that Kapala’s signature on the corporate agreement had been forged. Glodek brought suit to enforce the stock sale agreement and the partnership buy-out agreement.

In an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. Dale Ex Rel. Smith v. PushorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. Lacey v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Hughes v. MickaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. T.P.B. Properties v. Coldwell, Banker & Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Soderbeck v. Center for Diagnostic Imaging, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  2. In Re Estate of KapalaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API