Legal Opinion

Totten v. More Oakland Residential Housing, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 10, 1976No. Civ. 38154PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KANE, J.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment dismissing appellants’ action after respondent’s demurrer to the second amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend.

Respondent, More Oakland Residential Housing, Inc., a nonprofit corporation, owned and operated highrise apartment houses in Oakland, California. The purpose of the apartment complex was to replace slum dwellings in the ghetto area of the city and to provide inexpensive housing for low income people. The apartment house where the injury in dispute occurred was a part of the complex.

The events giving rise…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  3. Richards v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Sarah B. Kline v. 1500 Massachusetts Avenue Apartment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  5. Samson v. Saginaw Professional Building, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Isaacs v. Huntington Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Relyea v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Gomez v. TicorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. O'HARA v. Western Seven Trees Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. 7735 Hollywood Boulevard Venture v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API