Legal Opinion
Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Greenwich
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 8, 1992No. 10431PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The plaintiffs, E. Don Smith and Eileen Smith, appeal from the trial court’s decision affirming the denial of their subdivision application by the zoning board of appeals of the town of Greenwich.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court correctly upheld the denial of the plaintiffs’ subdivision application. The trial court found that the application conformed to all the stated subdivision regulations, but that it “did not meet the purposes of the subdivision regulations .... It does not conform to the town of Greenwich plan of development in that it does not meet the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- TLC Development, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Finn v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Reed v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Sonn v. Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Pelliccione v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Smith v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Lariviere v. Deep River Plan., Zoning, No. Cv97-0081313-S (Nov. 19, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
- Smith v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992