Legal Opinion

Friedland v. Djukic

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 2010No. Nos. 94319 and 94470PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank D. Celebrezze Jr., Judge.

{¶ 1} Appellant, Ivan Djukic, appeals from a judgment in favor of appellee, his former attorney, Dale R. Friedland, in the amount of $7,600 in attorney fees incurred in a personal-injury action. Djukic asserts that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment on his fraud and malpractice claims, in excluding his expert witnesses from trial, in directing a verdict in Friedland’s favor for alleged lost punitive damages in the underlying tort suit and for fraud, and in allowing Friedland to sue for a contingency fee based solely on an oral contract. After a…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Burr v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Ruta v. Breckenridge-Remy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Osborne v. KeeneyKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  2. DePompei v. SantabarbaraOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Luri v. Republic Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Andolsek v. BurkeOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Kebe v. BushOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API