Legal Opinion

Carico v. Kling

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1898No. 1376PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

This was an action of unlawful detainer. It was brought under the provisions of subdivision 6, section 3, of the forcible entry and detainer act, which defines unlawful detention. The subdivision in question reads as follows: “ When the property has been duly sold under any power of sale contained in any mortgage or trust deed which was executed by such person or any person under whom he or she claims, by title, subsequent to date of the recording of such mortgage, or trust deed, and the title under such sale has been duly perfected, and the purchaser at such sale or his assigns has duly *350deman…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beal v. BlairSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. Sav. & Loan Soc'y v. DeeringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Windett v. HurlbutIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Ingle v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  5. Kelly v. E. F. Hallack Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1896

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. BatemanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. HowellColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. HowellColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. StrattonColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. StrattonColorado Court of Appeals · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API