Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. Howell
Colorado Court of Appeals
Appeal from Washington District Court. Hon. H. P. Burke, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Cunningham, Judge.
1. Appellee, as plaintiff below, brought his fiction in ejectment. The answer was a general denial. Six months thereafter the defendant company filed what is denominated. a supplemental answer, wherein it sets up as a defense the payment of the taxes on the land in question for the year 1907, and on this new fact thus plead defendant attempts to invoke the seven-year statute of limitations. The payment of the taxes plead in the supplemental answer having been made after plaintiff filed his complaint, cannot avail the defendant as a defense, and we need not further consider…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. ColdrenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Carico v. KlingColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cleveland v. BatemanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
- Atwood v. TuckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. NeikirkColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
- Upham v. WeisshaarColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
- Page v. GillettColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.