Legal Opinion

PALELEI

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1979No. ID 2698PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #2698 MATTER OF PALELEI In Visa Petition Proceedings A 21328815 - Decided by Board April 10, 1979 (I) In order to qualify as a "daughter" for preference purposes, a beneficiary must once have qualified as a "child" of the petitioner under section 101(b)(1) of the Act. (2) To be valid for immigration purposes, an adoption must create a legal status or relationship. (3) To determine whether an adoption is valid, we look to the law of the place where the adoption took place. (4) To prove a customary adoption, the petitioner must establish that a custom existed which was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. BRANTIGANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1966
  2. Vicente Villamosa Nazareno v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  3. COKERBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1974
  4. KWOKBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1972
  5. NGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. De Los Santos v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  2. FAKALATABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1982
  3. Finau F. Mila v. District Director Of The Denver, Colorado District Of The Immigration And Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  4. Mila v. District Director of the Denver, Colorado District of the Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API