Legal Opinion

McInerney v. United Railroads of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 1920No. Civ. No. 3598PublishedCited by 18 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Bernard J. Flood, Judge. Modified and affirmed. ■ The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in the plaintiff’s favor in an action for damages for an alleged assault and false imprisonment. The cause was tried before a jury, which awarded the plaintiff the sum of two thousand dollars as compensatory damages and five hundred dollars as exemplary damages.

There were four defendants other than the appellant herein who were at the time of the plaintiff’s alleged injuries its employees. As to three of these—Henry Jones, M. Glennon, and John W. Lynch—a nonsuit was granted. As to the other codefendant, Charles G. Fitch, the verdict of the jury was in his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Bradley v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Benson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  4. American Express Co. v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Rahmel v. LehndorffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Toole v. Richardson-Merrell Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Hale v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Ebaugh v. RabkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Pacific Employers Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  5. Fonda v. Northwestern Public Service Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1940

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API