Legal Opinion
Dye v. Bartow
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 24, 2010No. 09-4147PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Wisconsin inmate John Dye brought this civil rights suit, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs because they did not allow him to take all of his meals in his cell. The district court screened and then dismissed his complaint, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, and Dye appeals. We affirm.
According to his complaint, the allegations of which we presume are true, see Santiago v. Walls, 599 F.3d 749, 756 (7th Cir.2010), Dye suffers from an anxiety-based eating disorder that prevents him from eating in the company of other people. This…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Santiago v. WallsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Robert Bruno Ciarpaglini v. Doctor Narinder Saini, Doctor Laurens D. Young, and Phil KingstonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Sain v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Nathaniel Lindell v. Scott McCallumCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dye v. BartowSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Anthony v. BaldwinDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2020
- Love v. Stateville Correctional FacilityDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020