Legal Opinion
Robert Bruno Ciarpaglini v. Doctor Narinder Saini, Doctor Laurens D. Young, and Phil Kingston
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 11, 2003No. 01-2657PublishedCited by 709 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge.
Robert Bruno Ciarpaglini, a prisoner in Wisconsin, is a frequent filer. He has had three previous lawsuits dismissed for the reasons stated in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) — in other words, he has filed three previous lawsuits that were dismissed because they were frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. His frequent filer status means he cannot proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in a new civil suit unless he is “under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). This does not mean he cannot proceed in any…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lewis v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Ricky Ashley v. E. Dilworth, Co-1, Maximum Security UnitCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- William A. Dupree v. R. W. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- White v. ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by709 opinions
- Donald F. Greeno v. George DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Chavis v. ChappiusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Dawn Ball v. FamiglioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Pettus v. MorgenthauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- John Ruddin Brown v. Lisa JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
704 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.