Legal Opinion
Nathaniel Lindell v. Scott McCallum
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 12, 2003No. 03-1550PublishedCited by 299 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
Nathaniel Lindell, an inmate at Wisconsin’s Secure Program Facility (WSPF), alleges in a 62-page complaint that state officials and prison staff are violating his civil rights by preventing him from practicing his religion and forcing him to participate in programs that violate his religious beliefs. Although he qualified to proceed informa pauperis and, as best we can tell, has managed to avoid accumulating three strikes on the basis of his numerous previous lawsuits (though this is something for the district judge to determine on remand), the judge refused his request…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lewis v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Salvatore G. Crisafi v. George E. HollandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- United States of America by and Through Joseph E. Garst v. Lockheed-Martin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by299 opinions
- James J. Kaufman v. Gary R. McCaughtryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Annare L. Loubser v. Robert W. ThackerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Dennis Walker v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Jeffery Paul v. Helen MarberryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Fidelity National Title Insurance Company of New York v. Intercounty National Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
294 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.