Legal Opinion
In re PATH at Stone Summit, Inc. (Concerned Neighbors, Appellants)
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided June 30, 2017No. 2016-298PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
¶ 1. Neighbors are a group of property owners in the neighborhood of PATH at Stone Summit, Inc.'s proposed therapeutic community residence in Danby. They appeal the Green Mountain Care Board's decision that the proposed project could proceed without a certificate of need under 18 V.S.A. § 9434(a)(5). We conclude that the appeal is not properly before this Court because Neighbors failed to timely file a petition to become interested parties. Accordingly, we dismiss Neighbors' appeal.
¶ 2. To better explain the events that gave rise to this appeal, we review the relevant aspects of the Board's…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Garzo v. Stowe Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- Casella Construction, Inc. v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- In re Appeal of CarrollSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Mason v. Thetford School BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
- Handverger v. City of WinooskiSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Friends of Pine Street d/b/a Pine Street Coalition v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- In re R.S., J.S., and I.S., Juveniles (S.C., Interested Party)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2021
- Fortieth Burlington, LLC v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- In re PATH at Stone Summit, Inc. (Concerned Neighbors, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2017