Legal Opinion

Garzo v. Stowe Board of Adjustment

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 6, 1984No. 83-013PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeck, J.

Plaintiff, Kenneth Garzo, brought suit for an order in the nature of mandamus to compel defendants Stowe Board of Adjustment and Lee Darrow, the board’s administrative officer, to enforce a zoning bylaw against defendant R. Edwin Jacobsen. The complaint alleged that the board granted defendant Jacobsen a conditional use permit to operate a budget family restaurant within the town of Stowe. The condition, imposed pursuant to a zoning bylaw, required all food and beverages to be served to customers seated at tables or counters either inside or outside the restaurant building. The complaint…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Clement v. GrahamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1906
  2. Town of Bennington v. Hanson-Walbridge Funeral Home, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  3. Dewitt v. Town of Brattleboro Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
  4. Bargman v. BrewerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  5. Fisher v. Town of MarlboroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. In Re Verizon Wireless Barton PermitSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  2. In Re Appeal of GadhueSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  3. In Re Appeal of GulliSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  4. Kirk Wool v. Office of Professional RegulationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
  5. Petition of FairchildSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API