Legal Opinion
In re Appeal of Carroll
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided March 9, 2007No. 05-421PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
¶ 1. Appellant Patricia Carroll appealed to the Environmental Court from a decision by the Town of Jericho Development Review Board (DRB) approving the plan of Mary Alice Rivers and CRC Sand & Gravel (collectively, “developers”), for a five-lot subdivision.1 The Environmental Court concluded that because Ms. Carroll did not participate in the hearing for final subdivision approval, she did not qualify as an interested party under 24 V.S.A. § 4465(b), and dismissed Ms. Carroll’s appeal. We conclude that Ms. Carroll’s participation in the previous hearings regarding the subdivision constituted…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wesco, Inc. v. SorrellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- In Re Wal Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Springfield Terminal Railway Co. v. Agency of TransportationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- In Re Appeal of MillerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- In Re Appeal of Department of Buildings & General ServicesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- In Re Verizon Wireless Barton PermitSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- Delta Psi Fraternity v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- In Re Village Associates Act 250 Land Use PermitSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- Shahi v. MaddenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- In Re Appeal of AlbertSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.