Legal Opinion

King v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1993No. 17932PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY/ISSUES

Appellee Ron King (King) commenced this action against appellant John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company (Hancock) in July of 1990 to collect money for medical expenses that Hancock refused to cover. King further alleged a cause of “bad faith” *620for the refusal. After depositions, King moved for summary judgment on the liability claim. Hancock cross-motioned on the same and moved to dismiss the bad faith claim.

On April 20, 1992, the trial court granted King’s motion for summary judgment while denying Hancock’s motions, holding that the bad faith…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Vellinga v. VellingaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Cimarron Insurance Co. v. CroyleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Hurney v. LockeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Alverson v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. SchillingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Peters v. Spearfish ETJ Planning CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Matter of Estate of GossmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Even v. City of ParkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API