Sackett v. Storm
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
Appellants John and Marion Storm challenge partial summary judgment granted to respondents. The trial court held that the Storms failed to establish a genuine issue of material fact as to the common law dedication as a public road of a private driveway on the Storm’s property. The trial court also held the Marketable Title Act, Minn.Stat. § 541.023 (1990), did not apply. We affirm.
FACTS
In 1981, appellants John and Marion Storm bought a lot on the western shore of Little Birch Lake from Henry Loxtercamp. The Storms’ cabin is connected to Todd County Road 19 by a gravel…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Wojahn v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mullins v. ChurchillCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Sackett v. StormCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992