Legal Opinion

Sackett v. Storm

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 28, 1992No. C9-91-963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

Appellants John and Marion Storm challenge partial summary judgment granted to respondents. The trial court held that the Storms failed to establish a genuine issue of material fact as to the common law dedication as a public road of a private driveway on the Storm’s property. The trial court also held the Marketable Title Act, Minn.Stat. § 541.023 (1990), did not apply. We affirm.

FACTS

In 1981, appellants John and Marion Storm bought a lot on the western shore of Little Birch Lake from Henry Loxtercamp. The Storms’ cabin is connected to Todd County Road 19 by a gravel…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Wojahn v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mullins v. ChurchillCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Sackett v. StormCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API