Legal Opinion
Sackett v. Storm
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 28, 1992No. C9-91-963Published
1Opinion of the Court
480 N.W.2d 377 (1992)
Doris O. SACKETT, et al., Respondents,
v.
John K. STORM, et al., Appellants.
No. C9-91-963.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
January 28, 1992.
Review Denied March 26, 1992.
David J. Meyers, Rinke-Noonan, St. Cloud, for respondents.
John D. Rice, John D. Rice Law Firm, Minneapolis, for appellants.
Considered and decided by SHORT, P.J., and SCHUMACHER, and KLAPHAKE, JJ.
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
Appellants John and Marion Storm challenge partial summary judgment granted to respondents. The trial court held that the Storms failed to establish a genuine issue of material fact as to the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Wojahn v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.