Legal Opinion

Funderburk v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 2009No. 49198PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*261OPINION

By the Court,

Hardesty, C.J.:

In this appeal, we address an issue of first impression: whether the definitions of “deadly weapon” set forth in NRS 193.165(6) are instructive on what constitutes a “deadly weapon” for burglary while in possession of a deadly weapon under NRS 205.060(4). Because the Legislature intended the definition of “deadly weapon” to be broad for purposes of NRS 205.060(4), we conclude that NRS 193.165(6)’s definitions are instructive for determining whether a weapon is a “deadly weapon” for purposes of NRS 205.060(4). Therefore, we determine that the district court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Steese v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Zgombic v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Nay v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Clem v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Studebaker Bros. Co. of Utah v. WitcherNevada Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Berry v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Guerrina v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2018
  3. United States v. Ricardo Guizar-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Davis v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Eggers (Daniel) v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API