Eggers (Daniel) v. State

in the information, we conclude that this claim lacks merit. See State v. Jones, 96 Nev. 71, 73-74,

605 P.2d 202, 204

(1980). Second, Eggers contends that the district court abused its discretion by giving an instruction which stated that "Mlle amount of a controlled substance needed to sustain a conviction for the crime(s) charged against the Defendant is that amount necessary for identification • as a controlled substance by a witness qualified to make such identification," rather than his proposed instruction. We review a district court's decision whether to give an instruction for an abuse…