Legal Opinion

Pate v. Merchants Nat. Bank of Mobile

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 25, 1983No. 82-34PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The trial court granted appellee bank's motion for summary judgment and denied appellant guarantor's motion for partial summary judgment. We must answer the following question: Was the bank, under the terms of the guaranty contract signed by guarantor, free to unilaterally take the guarantor's personal funds which were on deposit and apply those funds to the payment of the corporate indebtedness which the guarantor, under the terms of the guaranty agreement, had guaranteed to pay? After reviewing fully the terms of the guaranty contract, we hold that the trial court did not err in granting…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Air Conditioning Engineers, Inc. v. SmallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Pate v. Merchants Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. Furst v. ShowsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Birmingham Trust National Bank v. Midfield Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Layne v. GarnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Government Street Lumber Co. v. AmSouth Bank, NASupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Colonial Bank of Alabama v. CokerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. Ex Parte LittlepageSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. Eagerton v. Vision BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API