Legal Opinion

Layne v. Garner

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 16, 1992No. 1910262, 1910301PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

One issue is presented in these consolidated appeals: Can a guarantor, who has paid part of the guaranteed debt, enforce contribution against his coguarantors without having paid the entire indebtedness, given that the guaranty agreement contained the following provision:

"5. The undersigned [the guarantors] will not exercise or enforce any right of contribution, reimbursement, resource, or subrogation available to the undersigned against any person liable to payment of the indebtedness, or as to any collateral security therefore, unless and until all of the indebtedness shall have been fully…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hume v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Lloyd v. Service Corp. of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  3. Wilson v. World Omni Leasing, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Dill v. BlakeneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Colonial Bank of Alabama v. CokerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Covenant Health & Rehabilitation of Picayune, LP v. Estate of Moulds Ex Rel. BraddockMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Leonard v. Terminix Intern. Co., LPSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. American General Finance, Inc. v. BranchSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  4. Vann v. First Community Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  5. Briarcliff Nursing Home, Inc. v. TurcotteSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API