Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Littlepage
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 16, 2001No. 1991135PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Littlepage ("the husband") and Renee Littlepage ("the wife") were divorced on December 3, 1997. On April 23, 1998, the wife filed a "Motion for Rule Nisi" to require the husband to pay debts she said were covered by the settlement agreement incorporated into the divorce judgment. After an ore tenus proceeding, the trial court ordered the husband to pay $14,398.78 in additional debts not stipulated by the settlement agreement, even though it comprehensively addressed each party's rights to and obligations for the payment of debts. The husband appealed, and the Court of Civil Appeals…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mass Appraisal Services, Inc. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Smith v. CITICORP PERSON-TO-PERSON FINANCIAL CENTERSSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Terry Cove North, Inc. v. BALDWIN CTY. SEWER AUTH.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Pate v. Merchants Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Ala. v. BeckCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ex Parte Montgomery, 2100670 (ala.civ.app. 8-26-2011)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
- Romer v. RomerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
- Fontcuberta v. Cleco Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Montgomery v. MontgomeryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2012
- C.D.M. v. W.B.H.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.