In Re Belding
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
In this attorney disciplinary matter, we hold that David E. Belding (“Respondent”) shall be definitely suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year.
FACTS
Rucker-Taylor Matter
Todd Hunnicutt (“Mr. Hunnicutt”) and Elizabeth Hunnicutt (“Ms. Hunnicutt”) were having marital problems. According to Respondent, in the late summer of 2000, Mr. Hunnicutt approached Respondent and told him that he and his wife were undergoing a “Gestalt” method of therapy. Mr. Hunnicutt asked Respondent to create a fictitious set of divorce documents to “shock” his wife as prescribed by the therapy.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cate v. RiversSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
- In the Matter of WalkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Collins Entertainment Corp. v. Columbia "20" Truck Stop, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Matter of MozingoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- State ex rel. McLeod v. BelcherSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re DickeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- In Re WhiteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- In Re WimberlySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- In re BeldingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- In re WhiteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008