Legal Opinion

Matter of Mozingo

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 23, 1998No. 24769PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney discipline matter, respondent and disciplinary counsel have entered into an agreement under Rule 21, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. In the agreement, respondent admits misconduct and consents to be disbarred from the practice of law. We accept the agreement.

FACTS

Robert R. Forbes, Jr. Matter

Respondent represented Robert R. Forbes, Jr. in an ongoing domestic action. As part of that action, Forbes was ordered to make child support and alimony payments. Forbes’ current wife and her father wanted Forbes to file suit to reduce or eliminate these payments.

To help Forbes appease his family,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cate v. RiversSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  2. In the Matter of WalkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. State ex rel. McLeod v. BelcherSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  4. In re MozingoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. BlumKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  2. In Re BeldingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  3. In Re HoffmeyerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  4. In re BellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  5. Hagy v. PruittCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API