Legal Opinion
Gurmankin v. Costanzo
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 30, 1980No. 80-1449PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, Judith Gurmankin, a blind school teacher previously found to have been the subject of unconstitutional employment discrimination, appeals from the trial court’s denial of the requested remedies of backpay and tenure.1 Appellees are *1118the Board of Education of the School District of Philadelphia, Michael Marcase, Superintendent of the School District of Philadelphia, (who replaced Matthew Costanzo, the original defendant), Murray Bookbinder, Executive Director of Personnel and Labor Relations, and Martin K. Ferrier, Director of Professional…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- In re Volkswagen of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Laskaris v. ThornburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Fernandez v. ChardonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Lily Spencer, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/crossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Anthuis v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.