Legal Opinion
United States v. Kaykeo Somsamouth
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 18, 2003No. 02-50453, 02-50461PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge.
Khamphouck Somsamouth and Kaykeo Somsamouth, husband and wife, appeal their convictions for making false representations of material facts to the Social Security Administration (SSA) for the purpose of retaining Supplemental Security Income benefits. See 42 U.S.C. § 1383a(a)(2). Primarily, they disagree with the conception that their statements about working were, indeed, materially false. Ms. Somsamouth also claims that she was improperly sentenced. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
For many years before this proceeding commenced, the Somsamouths collected SSI benefits on the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. ShryockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Terrill DixonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Juan Gonzalez-TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Mark Kevin HicksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. MincoffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Samuel Orozco-AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Edward B. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Luoyang Bearing Corp. (Grp.) v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- State v. WhitakerHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.