Legal Opinion

Kimball v. Bell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1892PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from, Ellsworth District Court. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Strang, C.:

On the 16th of June, 1887, the plaintiff, Kimball, sold to the defendant, Bell, blocks 7 and 31 in Getty & Larkin’s addition to the city of Ellsworth, and gave him a title bond therefor, in which he agreed to execute and deliver to Bell, upon the payment by him of the purchase-money therein named, a good and sufficient warranty deed, conveying an absolute and indefeasible estate in fee-simple to said blocks of land. Having made the last payment on said land, Bell demanded of Kimball a deed therefor on the 5th of January, 1889. On the 17th of the same month suit was begun…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. O'Neill v. DouthittSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kling v. A. H. Greef Realty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Kimball v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  3. Allen v. GheerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Bell v. SternbergSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  5. Bryant v. GlennSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API