O'Neill v. Douthitt
Supreme Court of Kansas
Motion for Rehearing. The facts are stated in O’Neill v. Douthitt, 39 Kas. 316, and in the opinion herein, filed at the session of the court in February, 1889.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
VALENTINE, J.:
This case was decided by this court in May, 1888, and is reported in 39 Kas. 316, and iu 18 Pae. Pep. 199. A motion for a rehearing was in due time filed, and has now been presented to this court. It appears that Douthitt and Wyatt purchased certain real estate from O’Neill, for which they agreed to pay him $7,000, and O’Neill not only agreed to convey the land to Douthitt and Wyatt by a general warranty deed, conveying a perfect title, but also agreed to furnish to them an abstract of title showing such a title. Douthitt and Wyatt paid…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Burhans v. HutchesonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- O'Neill v. DouthittSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fisher v. CowlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- Rogers v. DockstaderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Durham v. HadleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
- Kimball v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
- Nicholson v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.