Legal Opinion

Bell v. Sternberg

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 9, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Ellsworth District Court. The opinion herein, filed June 9, 1894, states the nature of the action and the material facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

AlleN, J.:

This action was brought by Bell, as plaintiff, to recover from Sternberg the purchase price of block 16, in Getty & Larkin’s addition to the city of Ellsworth. The defendant, on the 31st of May, 1887, executed a written contract, by which he agreed, on payment, of $950, on or before the 31st day of May, 1888, to convey said land by a good and sufficient warranty deed. The purchase money was all paid by the plaintiff, but not on the very day it was due. The block of ground was subject, in common with the balance of the quarter section in which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hepburn and Dundas's Heirs v. Dunlop & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1816
  2. Dresel v. JordanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. Cook v. BeanIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Kimball v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McNutt v. NellansSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  2. Wiley v. HellenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  3. Monarch Portland Cement Co. v. WashburnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API