Legal Opinion

Parkinson v. 1199 SEIU National Benefit Fund

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 31, 2023No. 1:22-cv-01004Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RAKEEN PARKINSON, Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 22-cv-01004 (HG) (RER) 1199 SEIU NATIONAL BENEFIT FUND, and BENEFIT FUND STAFF ASSOCIATION, Defendants. HECTOR GONZALEZ, United States District Judge: Before the Court is an action brought by Plaintiff Rakeem Parkinson (“Plaintiff”) against Defendants 1199 SEIU National Benefit Fund (“NBF,” or the “employer”), and the Benefit Fund Staff Association (the “BFSA,” or the “union”) (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiff alleges a breach of the duty of fair representation against the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  5. Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. O'NeillSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API