Legal Opinion

Ehmling v. D. L. Ward Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 3, 1924No. Appeal, No. 51PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

In 1918 the defendant, D. L. Ward Company, being engaged in the distribution of paper in Philadelphia, established a department of its business at 619 Ranstead Street, known as the “papeterie department,” for the manufacture and sale of stationery. Alexander Ehmling, the plaintiff, was manager of this department from October 12, 1918, until April 21, 1921. Thereafter he brought this suit in assumpsit, claiming one-half of the net profits of the department during his management, which one-half he averred amounted to $26,198. Defendant denied plaintiff’s right to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Chaffee & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Dalmas v. KembleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  3. Armstrong & Latta v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Miller v. Belmont Packing & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Thomas v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Comstock v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Fleming v. AdamsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Pennsylvania R. R. Co. v. DriscollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Kingsley Clothing Manufacturing Co. v. JacobsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Bell v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API