Legal Opinion

Kingsley Clothing Manufacturing Co. v. Jacobs

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1942No. Appeals, 112 and 132PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

This suit is in assumpsit to recover $10,419.43 under two contracts, one dated August 29, 1940 (as amended by a supplemental agreement of November 2, 1940), and the other dated November 18,1940. Plaintiff filed a rule for judgment for the portion of its claim as to which the affidavit of defense was insufficient. Defendants took a rule to amend their affidavit of defense which was discharged by the court, and later a rule for another amendment which was made absolute by agreement of the parties. The court entered judgment in the sum of $1,451.72. Plaintiff filed a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. HowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Harwood v. Bruhn Et UxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Comstock v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Kaufmann v. KaufmannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  5. Gilbert v. Lebanon Valley Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re Pch Associates, F/k/a Simon Associates, Debtor. Liona Corporation, N v. V. Pch AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  2. McRoberts v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Corabi v. Curtis Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Joel S. Abel v. American Art Analog, Inc. And Michael D. Zellman and Philip Cohen. Appeal of American Art Analog, Inc. And Philip CohenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  5. Kirshon, Et Ux. v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API