Legal Opinion

(PC) Ashby v. Bosenko

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 28, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00544Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AARON W. ASHBY, No. 2:20-cv-0544 DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 TOM BOSENKO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983. Plaintiff claims his rights were violated when he was directed to clean a cell without 19 being provided adequate safety equipment. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to 20 proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 10) and his complaint for screening (ECF No. 1). For the 21 reasons…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API