Legal Opinion

Young v. Montgomery

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1903No. 19,931PublishedCited by 26 opinions

From Shelby Circuit Court; Douglas Morris, Judge. Action by Elizabeth A. Young against Samuel F. Montgomery. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGillett, J.

— This suit was instituted by appellant against appellee .to contest a testamentary instrument that had been probated as the last will of one Nancy Montgomery, deceased. There was a verdict and judgment for appellee. There is hut one sufficient assignment of error, and that is based on the ovei'rnling .of a motion for a new trial. Elliott, App. Proc., §351.

*69Appellant’s counsel first complain of the action 'of the trial court in the giving of instruction number two, whereby the issue was narrowed to the question as to whether the said Raney was of unsound mind at the time she attempted to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. McDonald v. McDonaldIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Manning v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Cline v. LindseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Warren v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Barr v. SumnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Robertson v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Warner v. MarshallIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Matter of Estate of PalamaraIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Embrey v. Southern Gas & Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1953

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API