Cole v. Capital Transit Co.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PROCTOR, Circuit Judge.
Appellant sued in the District Court for damages resulting from injuries allegedly caused by “negligent operation” of a streetcar of appellee. At the trial she adduced evidence in chief that she was a passenger on the streetcar and was injured by a sudden and violent stopping of the car. Without attempting proof of any specific act of negligence, she invoked the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur and rested her case. The Transit Company produced evidence tending to prove that the motorman was forced to make the sudden stop by an automobile of one Barnes unexpectedly cutting…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Washington Loan & Trust Co. v. HickeyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Hecht Co., Inc. v. JacobsenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Capital Transit Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Underwood v. Capital Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- D. C. Transit System, Inc. v. CarneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
- Williams v. Capital Transit Co. Williams v. DouglasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Pauline Loketch v. Capital Transit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Warner v. Capital Transit CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1958
- Lindsey v. DC Transit CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.