Legal Opinion

In Re Sessions

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 18, 2000No. 25196PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was found to have committed several acts of judicial misconduct while serving as the municipal judge for the City of Hanahan. The hearing panel recommended respondent receive a public reprimand. We agree with the findings of the panel and concur in the recommended sanction. Accordingly, we impose a public reprimand.

Facts

Respondent, a nonlawyer, was first appointed a Berkeley County Magistrate in 1993. He has served continuously since; his current term expires in 2003. From March until December 1997, he also served as a municipal judge in Hanahan. The present charges arose out of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re LarkinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Ishmell v. South Carolina Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  3. In re WhiteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ardis v. SessionsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Ardis v. SessionsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API