Legal Opinion
Ardis v. Sessions
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided July 10, 2006No. 4136PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHearn, C.J.
In this appeal of a chiropractic malpractice action, Diana B. Ardis and William David Ardis raise issues concerning the exclusion of evidence, jury instructions, and the trial court’s refusal to strike the cross-examination of Diana Ardis’s treating physician based on ex parte contact with the opposing side. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
In their complaint filed June 1, 2001, Diana and William Ardis (collectively “Ardis”) alleged that Edward L. Sessions negligently injured Diana by performing spinal manipulations on February 19, 1996. Ardis claims Sessions’s negligence caused a ruptured or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Whiteside v. Cherokee County School District No. OneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- McCourt by and Through McCourt v. AbernathySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Burroughs v. WorshamCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- Cohens v. AtkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- Koutsogiannis v. BB & TSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ardis v. SessionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Ardis v. SessionsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- Ardis v. SessionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009