Legal Opinion

Allen v. Lee

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 28, 1987No. 53102PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkus, J.

The defendant-landlord appeals from a $9,000 judgment in favor of the plaintiff-tenant, for failing to maintain the leased property in a habitable condition. He argues that the trial court admitted two unauthenticated exhibits and improperly instructed the jury, and that the jury’s verdict was excessive. The jury’s verdict exceeded the prayer of the plaintiff’s complaint, so we modify the judgment accordingly. As so modified, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

I

The tenant’s complaint asserted that the landlord breached his duties under the lease and R.C. 5321.04. It also alleged that he…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Paugh v. HanksOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Anderson v. CeccardiOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Schultz v. Barberton Glass Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Shroades v. Rental Homes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Powell v. Grant Med. Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Meacham v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Clay v. Schriver Allison Courtley Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Grote v. J.S. Mayer & Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Lloyd v. Roosevelt Properties, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API