Legal Opinion

Tompkins v. Allen

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 6, 1992No. 9126SC780PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Plaintiff brings forward in this appeal the sole question of whether his claim for unlawful termination was properly dismissed. Because the trial court considered matters outside the pleading, the judgment entered there must be considered as one for summary judgment. Long v. Fink, 80 N.C. App. 482, 342 S.E.2d 557 (1986); Kessing v. National Mortgage Corp., 278 N.C. 523, 180 S.E.2d 823 (1971).

This cause of action arises out of plaintiff’s termination as a store manager for a Roses Department Store. At the time of his dismissal, plaintiff was employed by defendant under an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Coman v. Thomas Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Sides v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Amos v. Oakdale Knitting Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  5. Privette v. University of North Carolina at Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Liggett Group, Inc. v. SunasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Buser v. Southern Food Service, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1999
  3. Ridenhour v. International Business MacHines Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Combs v. City Electric Supply Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. Daniel v. Carolina Sunrock Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API