Legal Opinion

J. H. Day Co. v. Mountain City Mill Co.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided November 7, 1918No. 10PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the J. H. Day Company against the Mountain City Mill Company and others. On final hearing on pleadings and proof.

1Opinion of the Court

SANFORD, District Judge.

After careful consideration of the evidence, including the affidavits and copies of letters patent admitted, pursuant to stipulation, on the reopening of the proof, and the arguments and briefs of counsel, my conclusions, briefly stated, without elaboration are:

[1] 1. Ward Patent No. 865,J¡61. This is a patent for an improvement in dough-cutting machines, providing a machine in which crackers and the like may be cut from the dough sheet by a cutter moving in unison with the feed of the sheet through the machine, so that the sheet may he fed continuously through the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Frederick R. Stearns & Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  2. Bullock Electric Mfg. Co. v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  3. Weir Frog Co. v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
  4. Johnson v. Foos Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
  5. Overweight Counterbalance Elevator Co. v. Henry Vogt Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Taggart Baking Co. v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1919
  2. Oxford Filing Supply Co. v. Globe-Wernicke Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API