Battle v. Columbia, Newberry & Laurens R. R.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Dantzuur, J., Laurens, July term, 1903. Action by P. C. Battle against Columbia, Newberry and Laurens R. R. From judgment for plaintiff defendant appeals. cite: Carrier ■is not liable for loss of property not usually carried as baggage, without notice to carrier: '60 L. R. A., 846. cite: Jewelry and money as baggage: 3 Fncy., 535, 537. As to delivery of trunk: 3 Ency., 2 ed., 661, note, 362, 563, 561. Action by husband for property of wife lies: 12 S. C., 180.
1Opinion of the Court
December 3, 1904. The first opinion was delivered by This is an action for damages. The complaint is as follows:
"The plaintiff, complaining of the defendant, alleges:
"1st. That the defendant is, and at the times hereinafter stated was, a corporation duly chartered, organized and doing business under the laws of the State of South Carolina, and owning and operating a line of railroad as a common carrier of goods and passengers between Columbia, South Carolina, and Laurens, South Carolina, a part of said line being in Laurens County, and said State, and that Clinton, South Carolina, is a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hickox v. Naugatuck RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1863
- Holliday v. Poston & SonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
- Sonneborn v. Southern RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
- Harzburg v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
- Shull v. CaughmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Russell Willis, Inc. v. PageSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
- Hamilton v. Baggage & Omnibus Transfer Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Godfrey v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
- Pittsburg Plate Glass Co. v. Monroe Bros.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- Pittsburg Plate Glass Co. v. Monroe Bros.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.