Pittsburg Plate Glass Co. v. Monroe Bros.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Gage;, J., Anderson, Action by Pittsburg Plate Glass Company against J. F. and R. A. Monroe, trading as Monroe Bros. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. T'he allegations in point in the answer is “but specifically deny each and every allegation of the said complaint, including all allegations of paragraph three thereof.”
Read the full summary
Before Gage;, J., Anderson, Action by Pittsburg Plate Glass Company against J. F. and R. A. Monroe, trading as Monroe Bros. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. T'he allegations in point in the answer is “but specifically deny each and every allegation of the said complaint, including all allegations of paragraph three thereof.” Paragraph three alleges delivery of goods. cite: Evidence as to other litigations irrelevant: Green Ev., 13a, 14a, 14b; 5 Ency., 861, 866; 61 S. C., 30-5. General denial raises issue of corporate capacity: 1 Ency. P. & P., 782-. Evidence should have been…
1Opinion of the Court
April 9, 1908. The opinion of the Court was delivered by This action affords a remarkable instance of what can be accomplished even under a "summer sun," for it seems that these two young men, the defendants, began work late in July, 1905, when they engaged in getting out the timbers to complete a brick store in the town of Honea Path, County of Anderson, State of South Carolina, which had a three-feet basement, two stories high, with a store room one hundred and twenty-eight feet in length and seventy feet in width, all of which was completed by the 15th day of October, 1905.
Being anxious…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Delleney v. Winnsboro Granite Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
- Land Mortgage &c. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
- Battle v. Columbia, Newberry & Laurens R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1904