Noakes v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Albert Lee Stephens, and Charles S. Burnell, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Defendants appeal from two certain judgments against them for damages and from the orders denying their motions for new trials.
The plaintiffs, who are brothers, were both injured August 14,1913, while at work in a trench excavated for the purpose of laying water-pipes in Sixteenth Street, in the city of Los Angeles. They were workmen employed by the defendant, Board of Public Service Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles. The other defendants were the City of Los Angeles, E. R. Flores, foreman in charge of the work, and the individuals composing the Board of Public Service Commissioners.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Slaughter v. Goldberg, Bowen & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
- Thompson v. Cal. Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
- Boyle v. Coast Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
- Ryan v. Oakland Gas, Light & Heat Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
3Cited by11 opinions
- Vaughn v. JonasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Miller v. Pacific Constructors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Clar v. Board of Trade of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Hirsch v. James S. Remick Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
- Asnon v. FoleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.