Legal Opinion

Doll v. Doll

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 26, 1944No. 37308PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’NIELL, Chief Justice.

The question in this case is whether a judgment sending the heirs of a deceased person into possession of the estate unconditionally, and thereby closing the succession, is a bar to a subsequent demand for collation.

Mrs. Ludeweka J. Doll died at her residence in Shreveport on December 9, 1939, leaving as her heirs three daughters, namely, Mrs. Maude Doll Broghan, Miss Loretta Doll, and Mrs. Mary Lou Doll Butler, and four sons, namely, Frank T. Doll, Howard F. • Doll, Charlie Doll and John M. Doll, and a grandson, Howard C. Belcher, who was the only child of a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Himel v. ConnelySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  2. Mitcham v. MitchamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  3. Succession of WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  4. Woolfolk v. WoolfolkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
  5. Prichard v. McCranieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Successions of WebreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
  2. Succession of DelesdernierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Succession of Doll v. DollSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  4. Mitchell v. LindlySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. Successions of ScardinoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API